In Adam Grant’s March 2026 ReThinking episode, Jessica Campbell discusses coaching professional hockey, earning trust and working in environments where she was often the only woman. The discussion is especially useful for…
In this article 14 sections
- What this original source covers
- Listening before correcting
- Care earns permission to challenge
- Use proof of competence
- Being first brings visibility and responsibility
- A practical way to use the ideas
- What to question or verify
- The actual episode and an important career-date clarification
- What makes feedback actionable?
- Individual achievement and the group outcome
- A practical team meeting template
- Frequently asked questions
- Frequently asked questions
- Source, scope and editorial independence
Quick answer: In Adam Grant’s March 2026 ReThinking episode, Jessica Campbell discusses coaching professional hockey, earning trust and working in environments where she was often the only woman. The discussion is especially useful for managers who must give demanding feedback without undermining a person’s confidence or dignity.
What this original source covers
Jessica Campbell is the principal speaker or guest connected to this specific podcast episode. The original publisher identifies the occasion as ReThinking with Adam Grant · March 17, 2026. This article focuses on explaining the meaning of the ideas and how to evaluate them; the source link is provided so that readers can check the full context for themselves.
This guide is an independent reading of an identifiable original source. It is written for people who want to understand the argument, its real-world applications and its limits, not for readers seeking an unauthorized word-for-word transcript. The headings below separate the speaker’s perspective from our editorial interpretation and practical suggestions.
Listening before correcting
Campbell describes beginning feedback conversations by asking players where they are mentally and emotionally. A technical mistake may be easier to discuss once both sides understand the player’s current situation. That does not mean abandoning standards; it means choosing a delivery method that makes learning more likely.
Care earns permission to challenge
The episode links high expectations with demonstrated personal investment. A coach who has consistently listened, prepared and supported someone may be able to deliver tough correction more effectively than one who appears only to criticize. Trust is built by a sequence of actions, not a single motivating speech.
Use proof of competence
Campbell describes showing players past examples of good decisions or a respected example they can learn from. The technique reframes feedback from a fixed judgment of identity to a specific, repeatable skill. For a workplace leader, an analogous practice is to show an employee a successful previous project and compare it with the current obstacle.
Being first brings visibility and responsibility
Her role in the NHL attracts attention beyond individual coaching decisions. The episode addresses how representation and professional credibility interact. An organization should not shift the entire burden of inclusion onto the person who enters a new space.
A practical way to use the ideas
Before your next difficult feedback conversation, collect one clear example of effective performance, one actionable point for improvement and a plan for practicing it. Ask the recipient how they see the issue first, then agree on what successful change will look like.
What to question or verify
The episode offers a coach’s experience, not a universal theory of management. The cultural and institutional conditions of professional sport differ from schools and offices. Respect privacy and do not use emotional-awareness language to demand personal disclosures.
For exact language or a decision about what the speaker actually said, return to the linked publisher material and use its event date. A short social-media excerpt can remove qualifications, speaker intent or chronology. Our examples and exercises are interpretations for readers, not claims that the speaker supplied the same examples.
The actual episode and an important career-date clarification
Jessica Campbell joined Adam Grant on the March 17, 2026 ReThinking episode “Breaking leadership barriers with hockey coach Jessica Campbell”. They discuss coaching, trust, feedback and what it means to enter an environment where few people share your experience. TED identifies her as a Seattle Kraken coach at the time of that recording. The Kraken announced on April 30, 2026 that she would explore other NHL coaching roles as her contract expired. Avoid presenting the March affiliation as a verified description of her present job in November.
Campbell’s historical first is still significant: the NHL reported her July 2024 appointment as the first full-time woman assistant behind an NHL bench. The milestone and her daily work should both be part of the story. Focusing exclusively on the label “first” can eclipse her specialist coaching skills, preparation and interactions with players.
What makes feedback actionable?
In the interview, Grant and Campbell explore how a leader can direct attention toward behavior rather than someone’s worth. “You are unreliable” is an accusation about identity; “The handoff reached the team two hours after the agreed time” names an event that can be checked. A useful response then asks what obstacle occurred and which adjustment would prevent repetition. This is not about removing honest criticism. It is about making expectations clear enough for a person to act on them.
A practical coach or manager can use a four-part format: describe the observable action, state its effect on the group, ask for a self-assessment, and agree on one next attempt. For a hockey player, the issue could concern decision-making at a particular moment on the ice; for an office team, it could concern a project handoff. The performance standard stays serious while the feedback creates a route to improvement.
Individual achievement and the group outcome
A common leadership error is to reward a person’s local success even when it harms the team’s overall performance. A sales representative might close a deal by promising impossible delivery; a player might chase a highlight and leave a teammate exposed. Before praising an outcome, ask whether the chosen behavior helps the shared goal over time. This is why a team needs agreed principles and a common understanding of what good execution looks like.
Campbell’s account also opens a question about being evaluated differently when visibly underrepresented. A single athlete’s or coach’s story cannot determine the experience of every woman in professional sports. Institutions need consistent standards, access to development and transparent pathways—not simply an inspirational profile. Treat differences in treatment as questions to investigate, rather than assuming they are identical everywhere.
A practical team meeting template
Set one clearly bounded goal for the week. Invite each member to name a risk without blaming a colleague. Identify two behaviors that would improve coordination; assign an owner and a review date. During review, compare what was planned with what happened and ask for specific evidence. If the whole team missed a cue, change the system instead of selecting one convenient scapegoat. Provide private channels for sensitive concerns, particularly where power differences might inhibit honest disagreement.
Frequently asked questions
Was Campbell still with the Kraken in November 2026? This guide does not claim that; the team’s April 2026 announcement said she would explore other roles. Is this a full transcript? No. The original publisher offers the recording and transcript; this article provides independent interpretation. Does task-focused criticism always work? It is a constructive starting point, but context, trust, fairness and the actual quality of coaching remain important.
Frequently asked questions
What is Jessica Campbell known for?
The episode identifies her as the NHL’s first full-time female assistant coach behind the bench.
What are her three Ls?
She discusses listening, lifting and loving as part of a caring, demanding coaching approach.
What is one practical management takeaway?
Pair clear standards with attentive, specific feedback.
Source, scope and editorial independence
Original source: Publisher recording or event page. The original date or event period is ReThinking with Adam Grant · March 17, 2026. This is an original explanation, not a transcript, paid endorsement or official page for Jessica Campbell. The linked publisher remains the authority for its own words and recording; interpretations and suggested exercises are our editorial work.
Explore the original material
Our editorial notes summarize and interpret a separately published recording or official text. For exact wording and fuller context, use the original source below.
TED — original publisher